Call of duty ghosts space warfare series#

Take “Brother Against Brother”, an actual slogan used when families from border states ended up facing each other on the battlefield. You’d be hard-pressed to find a more dramatically-charged war setting in American history, and Call of Duty is at its best when representing dramatic, ground-level warfare. In fact, Activision was among the few companies to publish Civil War shooters through its partnership with the History Channel, although they only received middling reviews at the time. But for some reason, despite extensive coverage in literature, film, documentaries, and other media, only a handful of Civil War games exist – most are strategy titles. Even today, it remains the most devastating war in American history, killing over 600,000 soldiers.

It left deep cultural scars across Northern and Southern states, some of which arguably never healed. It was among the world’s first industrial wars, making extensive use of railroads, factories, and mass-produced weapons. America’s Civil War may have been just over four years long, but its impact will be felt for centuries. Image Source: Wikipedia THE AMERICAN CIVIL WARĪctivision’s Elevator Pitch: Two brothers find themselves fighting on opposite sides of the most divisive conflict in American history. If Activision can do that, perhaps one day Call of Duty will be about: All you need is a unique setting, interesting weapons, and a dramatically-powerful war story where soldiers fight against all odds.

Call of duty ghosts space warfare series#

But the series can absolutely afford to visit historical war zones that video games have rarely addressed. Now Far Cry: Primal is headed to the Stone Age, where no mechanical weapons exist and sabretooth tigers roam the Earth.Ĭall of Duty doesn’t need to go that far back, no matter how much I’d love to see mammoth-based multiplayer matches. That’s what brought us Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon and the Far Cry 4 Yeti DLC. Take Far Cry, a series that started with remote modern settings, but keeps finding creative spins on the material. To be clear, Activision doesn’t need to stop making Call of Duty games, it just needs to be open to new ideas. Only the Black Ops games sold comparably to Modern Warfare, and that’s arguably because of Treyarch’s beloved Zombies mode – more proof that uniqueness is what makes you successful. With a yearly release schedule, I’d say it should be encouraged! But what does Activision have to show for a half-decade following Modern Warfare 3? Four near-future shooters (two specifically addressing human augmentation), all of which failed to revolutionize the industry. Call of Duty should be proof that franchises can move in experimental new directions and still become smash hits. Today, there are so many modern shooters that it’s hard to tell them apart, and we’re left forgetting how risky the genre used to be.Ĭall of Duty isn’t alone when it comes to repetition, but it’s truly amazing how little the series has changed in recent years. But of course, MW brought the entire FPS genre along for the ride. Then Call of Duty IV: Modern Warfare showed up in what was almost a revolutionary act, tackling murky geopolitics and nuclear weapons. Call of Duty was once rooted entirely in World War II combat, and showed little sign of becoming anything more. Video games often fall into the habit of remaking the same experience for each release.